In this case, I wanted brownies that were significantly cakier than the fudgey ones produced by the aforementioned recipe. Not that I have any problem with fudgey brownies--far from it; I love Shari's recipe and as such, decided to use it as the base for my modifications. My ultimate purpose in this endeavor was to achieve at least one of two ends: 1) Determine how the amount of each ingredient affects the overall result and 2) Get me my cakey brownies. I have gained some insight into the first, but future posts will have to take care of the second.
Software:
1/2tsp Baking powder (modified from soda, to aid poofiness)
1/3c Natural cocoa powder (not dutch cocoa! Results in overly-sweet brownies, in my opinion. Also, this ingredient was short-changed due to my running out of it and having to improvise)
2 cubes semisweet baker's chocolate, melted (semisweet is too sweet, in retrospect)
2/3c butter, softened
1/2c hot water
2c white sugar
2 eggs
1 1/3c all-purpose flour
1tsp vanilla extract
1/4tsp salt
Hardware:
Medium mixing bowl, for dry ingredients
KitchenAid mixer, with paddle attachment
Spatula for bowl scraping
Fork for mixing dry stuff
Preheat:
325F (future recipes will modify this to 350F)
As Shari's recipe provides a dense block of chocolatey goodness, I decided (in retrospect, unadvisedly) to add puffiness in as many different aspects as I could to see how things turned out. As such, I started out by creaming the butter and sugar together on medium speed. While this was going on, I mixed all the dry ingredients in the bowl with the fork (and, of course, I discovered I was short on chocolate and had to melt up some baker's cubes instead). Once the creaming was well underway, I added the eggs, making sure the first one was completely mixed in before adding the second. Once both eggs were integrated, I reduced the speed of the mixer to the lowest setting and added the water and vanilla. I gradually brought the speed back up to medium once the stuff wasn't threatening to slosh out of the bowl.
At this point, I had to add my melted chocolate to be blended into the goo, which was followed quickly by the dry ingredients. I tend to mix the dry stuff in slowly (and at low speed, mind you) due to a combination of wanting it to get mixed properly and having a bowl that doesn't pour well into the mixer bowl. After the dry was mixed in, I brought the speed back up to medium for a bit (probably the key bad idea in this experiment, as seen below) until I was satisfied. At this point, I took a picture:
Note that the thing appears to resemble whipped chocolate frosting as opposed to brownie batter--a result of very much overmixing, I have to guess. Regardless, I dumped it into the pan to see what the end result would be. I baked it at 325F for approximately 40 minutes before checking on it and determining that the center was still just about raw. All in all, I baked it for 70 minutes before a toothpick would come out clean, The final result:
As my thumb indentation at the bottom shows, the top is extremely dry and crusty, due to the long time at a somewhat low temperature. While this is not bad (actually, my coworkers complimented the contrasting textures of the crunch and the soft interior), it wasn't what I was going for. That said, the project taught me much about brownies themselves, and I look forward to building upon the experience.
Lessons learned:
One of my more educational projects thus far, I must admit.
- The "brownies" came out dry and crispy, so I'll increase the temperature in future experiments.
- The end product was too sweet, without enough chocolate flavor. I attribute this to an abundance of sugar, partially due to the semisweet baker's chocolate. I suspect a recipe with pure natural cocoa powder will have a better balance of flavors.
- Too much like cake--although this was expected, I now have my ideas as to why this is so. For my next attempt, I plan to still use the mixer and baking powder, but I will keep the mixer at its lowest speed and add the ingredients in a different order.
2 comments:
One of my friends said that baking, unlike cooking, is chemistry rather than artistry so you have to be pretty careful about how you mix things up.
I'm not sure why you decided not to use Dutch cocoa for sweetness purposes. It has no sweetness at all. Maybe you're confusing Dutch process cocoa for drinking cocoa? I use Van Houten (made by Milhouse) baking cocoa. The Dutch process part means it dissolves more easily in liquids.
I think it was too sweet but not chocolatey enough because of all the sugar. If you want to make them cakier, I'd advise more flour and less fat and sugar. The fudgey part of fudge brownies is the result of the heavy butter and sugar, low amounts of leavening agent and flour.
There's probably an ideal mix somewhere and I'll be following along to see how you do. :-)
My experience with dutch process powder is that it's sweetened significantly to make it more palatable. Natural chocolate is supposed to be drastically bitter, as it's untarnished by sweeteny things.
I didn't think the sugar was the reason for the sweetness because when I make the original recipe, they taste great, but with the same amount of sugar. Although the creaming may have changed the flavor somewhat (due to lightening it up a bit), I still blame the chocolate.
My initial idea was to add flour, but I wanted to see how it reacted to my other tweaks first. For my next draft, I'll isolate the change from baking soda to baking powder to see how drastically it alters the texture.
Post a Comment